Road Freight RFP - difference between US domestic & pan-European
Part 2
Road freight in the United States and Europe share a lot of similarities, however there are also a number of distinct differences. Companies that operate on both continents need to be aware of these differences when they issue a road-freight RFP. Simply using a copy of the RFP used for the United States to bid out the European freight will not work. This 2-part article will highlight the main differences that you will encounter when bidding out road freight domestically in the US and on a pan-European scale. In part 2, the remaining six differences.
In Europe Groupage (LTL) prices are based on a space use pricing mechanism. In order to set a price carriers need from their clients (shippers) the width, length, and height of each handling unit. The benefit is that this system creates a much easier and cleaner pricing system for all parties involved. The downside is that there is a wide range of pricing structures floating around as each carrier company is free to add its own nuances to a structure.
The different price structures, that are used in the US and Europe for LTL/Groupage transport, form a big challenge for most companies when bidding out freight. Setting the right class, discount and/or price structure make a huge difference in having a competitive or un-competitive tariff.
5)
Class driven LTL tariffs versus free
format groupage tariffs
Most US LTL carriers still
have the National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC) system embedded in their
systems. This system is complex and rigid. There are 17 freight classes,
ranging from class 50 to class 500. The system bases freight rates on standard
classifications rather than on a pricing mechanism that pays for space used on
a given piece of equipment. Currently shippers make their decisions based on
the (CzarLite) net rate and the related discount.
In Europe Groupage (LTL) prices are based on a space use pricing mechanism. In order to set a price carriers need from their clients (shippers) the width, length, and height of each handling unit. The benefit is that this system creates a much easier and cleaner pricing system for all parties involved. The downside is that there is a wide range of pricing structures floating around as each carrier company is free to add its own nuances to a structure.
In the US a discussion
around the NMFC price structure is heating up. Over the years, discounts have
evolved and become irrationally high. There is increasing discussion that base
rates should be restructured and re-indexed to a level that creates a rational
discounting process. Also talk about abandoning the NMFC structure is going on.
For the moment not many changes are seen however.
The different price structures, that are used in the US and Europe for LTL/Groupage transport, form a big challenge for most companies when bidding out freight. Setting the right class, discount and/or price structure make a huge difference in having a competitive or un-competitive tariff.
6)
Trailer weights – US tare versus EU country tare
In the United States the cross country tare weight for
heavy vehicles is set at 80.000 lbs max. In Europe tare weight is not set on a
pan-European level but rather on a country by country level (see table below).
7)
Fuel surcharge based on single
source versus many sources
Europe does not have a
single European source on which carriers base their fuel surcharges. In most
cases fuel surcharges are based on individual country fuel indexes depending on
the country where the carrier is located.
In the US the most commonly
used index for road fuel surcharges is the Energy Information Administration's
National U.S. Average On Highway Diesel Fuel Prices.
As a result it is easier to
compare fuel surcharges in the US than it is in Europe. In Europe different
factors influence the fuel surcharge.
8)
Single point of contact versus many
points of contact
In a country wide national
US road RFP you will mostly deal with a single point of contact at the carrier
company you invited to participate. This person will be responsible for all
contact and all actions related to the RFP for the whole United States.
In Europe this is most of
the time a different story. Finding out which person you have to deal with
often depends on where the tender is issued, location(s) of the shipper and the
shipper’s industry. The larger carriers have implemented tender management groups
that cover pan-European or global tenders centrally. But in many cases you will
have to find the right person at the right location on country level to deal
with your RFP.
9)
Single language & culture versus
many languages & cultures
Dealing with pan-European
freight tenders is always more challenging than dealing with a domestic US
freight tender. In the US the primary business language is English and you deal
with a single US culture (with some local State flavours mixed in here and
there). Although English is the preferred business language in Europe it is not
a given that this applies everywhere. Some countries do better in this respect
than others.
When issuing a pan-European
tender which involves shipper locations and carrier locations in many different
countries, languages and cultural differences become a certain issue to deal
with. Being able to communicate in multiple languages is a benefit when you
deal with these situations. Also having a good understanding of cultural
sensitivities will help you in your project.
10)
State/Country networks versus
Country/pan-European networks
In the United States
shippers have a choice between carriers offering a national network or carriers
offering a regional network (covering a number of States). In Europe this is
more or less the same. There are a number of pan-European carriers, covering
most of the European countries. Next to that there are many regional carriers
covering a single country or a group of countries.
On
both sides of the ocean the selection of the right carrier mix (local players
versus country/European network players) is important to the success of the
RFP. While for instance a pan-European carrier will be able to offer you a
single point of handling all your freight, they might not offer the best
service, coverage and/or price levels. Local or regional carriers can often
offer a better service, coverage and price but have limitations in the
geographical range they span.